Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Woo-yeong Jeong remove | Thomas Lemar remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 26 | 30 |
| Position | Attacking midfielder | Attacking midfielder |
| Club · league | 1.FC Union Berlin · Bundesliga | Girona FC · Laliga |
| League strength | 0.94 | 0.95 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1392 | 1413 |
| League minutes | 1193 (39%) | 1259 (37%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.38 | 0.29 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.45 | 0.48 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 58 | 65 |
| Market value | €3.5M | €1.8M |
| Estimated acquisition | €1.4M – €4.5M | €530k – €1.7M |
| Model value | €2.5M – €6.3M | €2.2M – €4.2M |
| Projected value (24m) | €1.5M – €3.9M | €665k – €1.8M |
| Bargain Index | 53/100 | 77/100 |
| Development | Low | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Moderate | High |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€1.4M – €4.5M Model value (performance-implied)€2.5M – €6.3M Projected value (24 months)€1.5M – €3.9M Dashed line: current market value (€3.5M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€530k – €1.7M Model value (performance-implied)€2.2M – €4.2M Projected value (24 months)€665k – €1.8M Dashed line: current market value (€1.8M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Woo-yeong Jeong and Thomas Lemar
- Jeong is 4 years younger, which the models associate with more appreciation and resale potential.
- Lemar is estimated to cost far less (€707k vs €2.6M mid-estimate).
- On value for money the model prefers Lemar (Bargain Index 77 vs 53) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
- Risk differs: Jeong Moderate, Lemar High.