Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Beto remove | Jack Grealish remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 28 | 30 |
| Position | Striker | Left winger |
| Club · league | Everton FC · Premier League | Everton FC · Premier League |
| League strength | 1.30 | 1.30 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1556 | 1556 |
| League minutes | 1565 (46%) | 1632 (48%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.57 | 0.44 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.58 | 0.50 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 92 | 92 |
| Market value | €18.0M | €20.0M |
| Estimated acquisition | €7.9M – €20.1M | €5.4M – €16.0M |
| Model value | €20.0M – €32.6M | €13.9M – €27.2M |
| Projected value (24m) | €5.5M – €15.0M | €3.4M – €10.1M |
| Bargain Index | 40/100 | 5/100 |
| Development | Low | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Moderate | Moderate |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€7.9M – €20.1M Model value (performance-implied)€20.0M – €32.6M Projected value (24 months)€5.5M – €15.0M Dashed line: current market value (€18.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€5.4M – €16.0M Model value (performance-implied)€13.9M – €27.2M Projected value (24 months)€3.4M – €10.1M Dashed line: current market value (€20.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Beto and Jack Grealish
- Beto is 2 years younger, which the models associate with more appreciation and resale potential.
- On value for money the model prefers Beto (Bargain Index 40 vs 5) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.