Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Bartuğ Elmaz remove | Jin-ho Jo remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 23 | 22 |
| Position | Defensive midfielder | Defensive midfielder |
| Club · league | Fatih Karagümrük · Super Lig | Konyaspor · Super Lig |
| League strength | 0.40 | 0.40 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1195 | 1230 |
| League minutes | 1138 (37%) | 1101 (36%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.08 | 0.16 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.18 | 0.21 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 10 | 5 |
| Market value | €1.5M | €1.0M |
| Estimated acquisition | €590k – €1.6M | €420k – €1.2M |
| Model value | €330k – €1.1M | €254k – €662k |
| Projected value (24m) | €777k – €2.4M | €638k – €2.9M |
| Bargain Index | 79/100 | 98/100 |
| Development | Low | High |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | 35% |
| Risk | Moderate | Very High |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€590k – €1.6M Model value (performance-implied)€330k – €1.1M Projected value (24 months)€777k – €2.4M Dashed line: current market value (€1.5M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€420k – €1.2M Model value (performance-implied)€254k – €662k Projected value (24 months)€638k – €2.9M Dashed line: current market value (€1.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Bartuğ Elmaz and Jin-ho Jo
- Jo is estimated to cost far less (€561k vs €1.1M mid-estimate).
- On value for money the model prefers Jo (Bargain Index 98 vs 79) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
- Risk differs: Elmaz Moderate, Jo Very High.