Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Marcus Linday remove | Tika de Jonge remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 23 | 23 |
| Position | Central midfielder | Central midfielder |
| Club · league | SC Heerenveen · Eredivisie | FC Groningen · Eredivisie |
| League strength | 0.43 | 0.43 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1284 | 1248 |
| League minutes | 2308 (75%) | 2051 (67%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.16 | 0.18 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.16 | 0.19 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 26 | 16 |
| Market value | €5.0M | €1.8M |
| Estimated acquisition | €2.4M – €6.7M | €922k – €3.0M |
| Model value | €392k – €1.7M | €354k – €1.0M |
| Projected value (24m) | €2.8M – €8.4M | €1.0M – €3.1M |
| Bargain Index | 80/100 | 68/100 |
| Development | Low | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Moderate | Moderate |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€2.4M – €6.7M Model value (performance-implied)€392k – €1.7M Projected value (24 months)€2.8M – €8.4M Dashed line: current market value (€5.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€922k – €3.0M Model value (performance-implied)€354k – €1.0M Projected value (24 months)€1.0M – €3.1M Dashed line: current market value (€1.8M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Marcus Linday and Tika de Jonge
- Jonge is estimated to cost far less (€1.7M vs €3.9M mid-estimate).
- On value for money the model prefers Linday (Bargain Index 80 vs 68) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.