Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Julius Berthel Askou remove | Adam Nygaard remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 20 | 20 |
| Position | Centre-back | Centre-back |
| Club · league | Odense Boldklub · Superliga | FC Fredericia · Superliga |
| League strength | 0.47 | 0.47 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1215 | 1183 |
| League minutes | 1311 (66%) | 1006 (51%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 1 | 0 |
| Market value | €2.5M | €500k |
| Estimated acquisition | €1.4M – €4.4M | €320k – €1.9M |
| Model value | €272k – €835k | €157k – €365k |
| Projected value (24m) | €1.5M – €7.7M | €326k – €1.2M |
| Bargain Index | 96/100 | 38/100 |
| Development | Very High | Moderate |
| Breakout probability | 45% | 9% |
| Risk | Very High | High |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€1.4M – €4.4M Model value (performance-implied)€272k – €835k Projected value (24 months)€1.5M – €7.7M Dashed line: current market value (€2.5M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€320k – €1.9M Model value (performance-implied)€157k – €365k Projected value (24 months)€326k – €1.2M Dashed line: current market value (€500k). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Julius Berthel Askou and Adam Nygaard
- Askou was used far more by the club (66% of minutes vs 51%).
- Nygaard is estimated to cost far less (€620k vs €1.9M mid-estimate).
- On value for money the model prefers Askou (Bargain Index 96 vs 38) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
- Risk differs: Askou Very High, Nygaard High.