Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Adem Arous remove | Yaya Bojang remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 21 | 21 |
| Position | Centre-back | Centre-back |
| Club · league | Kasimpasa · Super Lig | Odense Boldklub · Superliga |
| League strength | 0.40 | 0.47 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1203 | 1215 |
| League minutes | 1672 (55%) | 927 (47%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.11 | 0.10 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.11 | 0.10 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 6 | 1 |
| Market value | €4.0M | €800k |
| Estimated acquisition | €2.2M – €6.5M | €408k – €1.7M |
| Model value | €300k – €786k | €206k – €600k |
| Projected value (24m) | €2.1M – €9.9M | €523k – €2.7M |
| Bargain Index | 58/100 | 90/100 |
| Development | High | High |
| Breakout probability | 44% | 32% |
| Risk | High | Very High |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€2.2M – €6.5M Model value (performance-implied)€300k – €786k Projected value (24 months)€2.1M – €9.9M Dashed line: current market value (€4.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€408k – €1.7M Model value (performance-implied)€206k – €600k Projected value (24 months)€523k – €2.7M Dashed line: current market value (€800k). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Adem Arous and Yaya Bojang
- Bojang is estimated to cost far less (€544k vs €4.1M mid-estimate).
- On value for money the model prefers Bojang (Bargain Index 90 vs 58) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
- Risk differs: Arous High, Bojang Very High.