Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Andreas Verstraeten remove | Amando Lapage remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 20 | 21 |
| Position | Centre-back | Centre-back |
| Club · league | Royal Antwerp FC · Jupiler Pro League | KVC Westerlo · Jupiler Pro League |
| League strength | 0.65 | 0.65 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1365 | 1348 |
| League minutes | 921 (34%) | 945 (35%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.10 | 0.00 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.07 | 0.04 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 19 | 14 |
| Market value | €1.0M | €800k |
| Estimated acquisition | €542k – €2.8M | €369k – €1.6M |
| Model value | €668k – €2.7M | €424k – €1.6M |
| Projected value (24m) | €667k – €3.9M | €463k – €2.4M |
| Bargain Index | 48/100 | 65/100 |
| Development | High | High |
| Breakout probability | 35% | 39% |
| Risk | High | High |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€542k – €2.8M Model value (performance-implied)€668k – €2.7M Projected value (24 months)€667k – €3.9M Dashed line: current market value (€1.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€369k – €1.6M Model value (performance-implied)€424k – €1.6M Projected value (24 months)€463k – €2.4M Dashed line: current market value (€800k). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Andreas Verstraeten and Amando Lapage
- On value for money the model prefers Lapage (Bargain Index 65 vs 48) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.