Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Hyllarion Goore remove | Alan Minda remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 20 | 23 |
| Position | Striker | Striker |
| Club · league | KAA Gent · Jupiler Pro League | Cercle Brugge · Jupiler Pro League |
| League strength | 0.65 | 0.65 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1403 | 1325 |
| League minutes | 1132 (42%) | 969 (36%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.64 | 0.56 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.59 | 0.57 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 31 | 24 |
| Market value | €4.0M | €3.0M |
| Estimated acquisition | €3.6M – €9.6M | €1.4M – €4.5M |
| Model value | €1.2M – €4.5M | €810k – €3.0M |
| Projected value (24m) | €2.2M – €11.0M | €1.2M – €4.4M |
| Bargain Index | 34/100 | 18/100 |
| Development | High | Low |
| Breakout probability | 31% | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | High | High |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€3.6M – €9.6M Model value (performance-implied)€1.2M – €4.5M Projected value (24 months)€2.2M – €11.0M Dashed line: current market value (€4.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€1.4M – €4.5M Model value (performance-implied)€810k – €3.0M Projected value (24 months)€1.2M – €4.4M Dashed line: current market value (€3.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Hyllarion Goore and Alan Minda
- Goore is 2 years younger, which the models associate with more appreciation and resale potential.
- Minda is estimated to cost far less (€3.0M vs €5.7M mid-estimate).
- On value for money the model prefers Goore (Bargain Index 34 vs 18) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.