Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Ross Barkley remove | Pathé Ciss remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 32 | 32 |
| Position | Central midfielder | Central midfielder |
| Club · league | Aston Villa · Premier League | Rayo Vallecano · Laliga |
| League strength | 1.30 | 0.95 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1721 | 1518 |
| League minutes | 852 (25%) | 1994 (58%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.42 | 0.14 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.24 | 0.19 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 91 | 79 |
| Market value | €4.0M | €1.8M |
| Estimated acquisition | €973k – €3.3M | €475k – €1.4M |
| Model value | €6.4M – €12.2M | €1.5M – €3.7M |
| Projected value (24m) | €1.4M – €2.9M | €514k – €1.2M |
| Bargain Index | No index | 50/100 |
| Development | Low | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Very High | High |
| Data confidence | Low | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€973k – €3.3M Model value (performance-implied)€6.4M – €12.2M Projected value (24 months)€1.4M – €2.9M Dashed line: current market value (€4.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€475k – €1.4M Model value (performance-implied)€1.5M – €3.7M Projected value (24 months)€514k – €1.2M Dashed line: current market value (€1.8M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Ross Barkley and Pathé Ciss
- Barkley plays in a stronger league (1.30 vs 0.95); the other's output carries more translation uncertainty.
- Ciss was used far more by the club (58% of minutes vs 25%).
- Ciss is estimated to cost far less (€633k vs €1.3M mid-estimate).
- Risk differs: Barkley Very High, Ciss High.