Player Comparison

Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.

Dan Burn removeMarc Oliver Kempf remove
Age3431
PositionCentre-backCentre-back
Club · leagueNewcastle United · Premier LeagueComo 1907 · Serie A
League strength1.300.93
Team strength (Elo)16311589
League minutes2199 (64%)2323 (68%)
G+A per 90 (raw)0.160.19
G+A per 90 (context-adjusted)0.110.15
Passing / defending / progressionData unavailableData unavailable
Performance percentile9985
Market value€4.0M€3.5M
Estimated acquisition€1.5M – €4.1M€1.2M – €3.0M
Model value€3.4M – €6.9M€3.3M – €10.6M
Projected value (24m)€957k – €2.7M€1.3M – €2.7M
Bargain IndexNo index65/100
DevelopmentLowLow
Breakout probabilityn/a (age > 23)n/a (age > 23)
RiskModerateModerate
Data confidenceMediumMedium
Value picture
Estimated acquisition€1.5M – €4.1M
Model value (performance-implied)€3.4M – €6.9M
Projected value (24 months)€957k – €2.7M
Dashed line: current market value (€4.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.
Estimated acquisition€1.2M – €3.0M
Model value (performance-implied)€3.3M – €10.6M
Projected value (24 months)€1.3M – €2.7M
Dashed line: current market value (€3.5M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.

What separates Dan Burn and Marc Oliver Kempf

  • Kempf is 3 years younger, which the models associate with more appreciation and resale potential.
  • Burn plays in a stronger league (1.30 vs 0.93); the other's output carries more translation uncertainty.