Player Comparison

Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.

Federico Ceccherini removeWagane Faye remove
Age3432
PositionCentre-backCentre-back
Club · leagueUS Cremonese · Serie ARAAL La Louvière · Jupiler Pro League
League strength0.930.65
Team strength (Elo)12991297
League minutes481 (14%)1947 (72%)
G+A per 90 (raw)0.190.14
G+A per 90 (context-adjusted)0.180.13
Passing / defending / progressionData unavailableData unavailable
Performance percentile4228
Market value€400k€400k
Estimated acquisition€114k – €493k€126k – €332k
Model value€222k – €951k€197k – €668k
Projected value (24m)€188k – €406k€122k – €356k
Bargain IndexNo index73/100
DevelopmentLowLow
Breakout probabilityn/a (age > 23)n/a (age > 23)
RiskHighHigh
Data confidenceLowMedium
Value picture
Estimated acquisition€114k – €493k
Model value (performance-implied)€222k – €951k
Projected value (24 months)€188k – €406k
Dashed line: current market value (€400k). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.
Estimated acquisition€126k – €332k
Model value (performance-implied)€197k – €668k
Projected value (24 months)€122k – €356k
Dashed line: current market value (€400k). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.

What separates Federico Ceccherini and Wagane Faye

  • Ceccherini plays in a stronger league (0.93 vs 0.65); the other's output carries more translation uncertainty.
  • Faye was used far more by the club (72% of minutes vs 14%).
  • Faye is estimated to cost far less (€168k vs €270k mid-estimate).