Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Vitaliy Buyalskyi remove | Enis Bardhi remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 33 | 31 |
| Position | Attacking midfielder | Attacking midfielder |
| Club · league | Dynamo Kyiv · Premier Liga | Konyaspor · Super Lig |
| League strength | 0.25 | 0.40 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1324 | 1230 |
| League minutes | 1275 (47%) | 2066 (68%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 1.06 | 0.44 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.63 | 0.43 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 59 | 41 |
| Market value | €2.5M | €2.5M |
| Estimated acquisition | €606k – €1.8M | €562k – €1.7M |
| Model value | €511k – €2.0M | €579k – €1.5M |
| Projected value (24m) | €490k – €1.6M | €655k – €1.7M |
| Bargain Index | No index | 21/100 |
| Development | Low | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Very High | High |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€606k – €1.8M Model value (performance-implied)€511k – €2.0M Projected value (24 months)€490k – €1.6M Dashed line: current market value (€2.5M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€562k – €1.7M Model value (performance-implied)€579k – €1.5M Projected value (24 months)€655k – €1.7M Dashed line: current market value (€2.5M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Vitaliy Buyalskyi and Enis Bardhi
- Bardhi is 2 years younger, which the models associate with more appreciation and resale potential.
- Bardhi plays in a stronger league (0.40 vs 0.25); the other's output carries more translation uncertainty.
- Buyalskyi has higher context-adjusted goal contributions (0.63 vs 0.43 per 90).
- Bardhi was used far more by the club (68% of minutes vs 47%).
- Risk differs: Buyalskyi Very High, Bardhi High.