Player Comparison

Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.

Nathan Aké removeVictor Lindelöf remove
Age3131
PositionCentre-backCentre-back
Club · leagueManchester City · Premier LeagueAston Villa · Premier League
League strength1.301.30
Team strength (Elo)18091721
League minutes688 (20%)944 (28%)
G+A per 90 (raw)0.000.10
G+A per 90 (context-adjusted)0.030.06
Passing / defending / progressionData unavailableData unavailable
Performance percentile9091
Market value€12.0M€5.0M
Estimated acquisition€4.7M – €16.1M€1.9M – €4.7M
Model value€7.3M – €16.6M€4.6M – €13.9M
Projected value (24m)€3.4M – €6.0M€1.7M – €2.9M
Bargain IndexNo index15/100
DevelopmentLowLow
Breakout probabilityn/a (age > 23)n/a (age > 23)
RiskHighHigh
Data confidenceLowMedium
Value picture
Estimated acquisition€4.7M – €16.1M
Model value (performance-implied)€7.3M – €16.6M
Projected value (24 months)€3.4M – €6.0M
Dashed line: current market value (€12.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.
Estimated acquisition€1.9M – €4.7M
Model value (performance-implied)€4.6M – €13.9M
Projected value (24 months)€1.7M – €2.9M
Dashed line: current market value (€5.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.

What separates Nathan Aké and Victor Lindelöf

  • Lindelöf is estimated to cost far less (€2.5M vs €10.4M mid-estimate).