Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Paul Izzo remove | Francisco Tinaglini remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 31 | 27 |
| Position | Goalkeeper | Goalkeeper |
| Club · league | Randers FC · Superliga | Panserraikos Serres · Super League 1 |
| League strength | 0.47 | 0.42 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1278 | 1104 |
| League minutes | 1530 (77%) | 1839 (79%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 17 | 6 |
| Market value | €500k | €400k |
| Estimated acquisition | €121k – €439k | €110k – €412k |
| Model value | €328k – €464k | €234k – €598k |
| Projected value (24m) | €245k – €453k | €263k – €529k |
| Bargain Index | 79/100 | 97/100 |
| Development | Low | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Very High | Moderate |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€121k – €439k Model value (performance-implied)€328k – €464k Projected value (24 months)€245k – €453k Dashed line: current market value (€500k). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€110k – €412k Model value (performance-implied)€234k – €598k Projected value (24 months)€263k – €529k Dashed line: current market value (€400k). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Paul Izzo and Francisco Tinaglini
- Tinaglini is 4 years younger, which the models associate with more appreciation and resale potential.
- On value for money the model prefers Tinaglini (Bargain Index 97 vs 79) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
- Risk differs: Izzo Very High, Tinaglini Moderate.