Player Comparison

Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.

Victor Lindelöf removeClément Lenglet remove
Age3131
PositionCentre-backCentre-back
Club · leagueAston Villa · Premier LeagueAtlético de Madrid · Laliga
League strength1.300.95
Team strength (Elo)17211619
League minutes944 (28%)1393 (41%)
G+A per 90 (raw)0.100.07
G+A per 90 (context-adjusted)0.060.06
Passing / defending / progressionData unavailableData unavailable
Performance percentile9194
Market value€5.0M€4.0M
Estimated acquisition€1.9M – €4.7M€1.3M – €3.3M
Model value€4.6M – €13.9M€6.8M – €23.2M
Projected value (24m)€1.7M – €2.9M€1.3M – €2.9M
Bargain Index15/10039/100
DevelopmentLowLow
Breakout probabilityn/a (age > 23)n/a (age > 23)
RiskHighHigh
Data confidenceMediumMedium
Value picture
Estimated acquisition€1.9M – €4.7M
Model value (performance-implied)€4.6M – €13.9M
Projected value (24 months)€1.7M – €2.9M
Dashed line: current market value (€5.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.
Estimated acquisition€1.3M – €3.3M
Model value (performance-implied)€6.8M – €23.2M
Projected value (24 months)€1.3M – €2.9M
Dashed line: current market value (€4.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.

What separates Victor Lindelöf and Clément Lenglet

  • Lindelöf plays in a stronger league (1.30 vs 0.95); the other's output carries more translation uncertainty.
  • On value for money the model prefers Lenglet (Bargain Index 39 vs 15) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.