Player Comparison

Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.

Federico Dimarco removeAlejandro Grimaldo remove
Age2830
PositionLeft midfielderLeft midfielder
Club · leagueInter Milan · Serie ABayer 04 Leverkusen · Bundesliga
League strength0.930.94
Team strength (Elo)17221626
League minutes2704 (79%)2524 (83%)
G+A per 90 (raw)0.830.57
G+A per 90 (context-adjusted)0.490.30
Passing / defending / progressionData unavailableData unavailable
Performance percentile9996
Market value€50.0M€20.0M
Estimated acquisition€17.7M – €40.7M€10.8M – €20.3M
Model value€45.8M – €66.1M€14.1M – €29.4M
Projected value (24m)€19.0M – €32.4M€5.3M – €10.6M
Bargain Index62/1002/100
DevelopmentLowLow
Breakout probabilityn/a (age > 23)n/a (age > 23)
RiskLowLow
Data confidenceMediumMedium
Value picture
Estimated acquisition€17.7M – €40.7M
Model value (performance-implied)€45.8M – €66.1M
Projected value (24 months)€19.0M – €32.4M
Dashed line: current market value (€50.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.
Estimated acquisition€10.8M – €20.3M
Model value (performance-implied)€14.1M – €29.4M
Projected value (24 months)€5.3M – €10.6M
Dashed line: current market value (€20.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.

What separates Federico Dimarco and Alejandro Grimaldo

  • Dimarco is 2 years younger, which the models associate with more appreciation and resale potential.
  • Dimarco has higher context-adjusted goal contributions (0.49 vs 0.30 per 90).
  • Grimaldo is estimated to cost far less (€13.8M vs €23.6M mid-estimate).
  • On value for money the model prefers Dimarco (Bargain Index 62 vs 2) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.