Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Morten Thorsby remove | Alessandro Deiola remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 30 | 30 |
| Position | Central midfielder | Central midfielder |
| Club · league | Genoa CFC · Serie A | Cagliari Calcio · Serie A |
| League strength | 0.93 | 0.93 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1356 | 1376 |
| League minutes | 1374 (40%) | 1435 (42%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.26 | 0.13 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.31 | 0.21 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 68 | 59 |
| Market value | €2.8M | €1.5M |
| Estimated acquisition | €1.0M – €2.7M | €464k – €1.5M |
| Model value | €1.9M – €4.7M | €979k – €3.7M |
| Projected value (24m) | €841k – €2.3M | €432k – €1.3M |
| Bargain Index | 45/100 | 68/100 |
| Development | Low | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Moderate | Moderate |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€1.0M – €2.7M Model value (performance-implied)€1.9M – €4.7M Projected value (24 months)€841k – €2.3M Dashed line: current market value (€2.8M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€464k – €1.5M Model value (performance-implied)€979k – €3.7M Projected value (24 months)€432k – €1.3M Dashed line: current market value (€1.5M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Morten Thorsby and Alessandro Deiola
- Thorsby has higher context-adjusted goal contributions (0.31 vs 0.21 per 90).
- Deiola is estimated to cost far less (€815k vs €1.6M mid-estimate).
- On value for money the model prefers Deiola (Bargain Index 68 vs 45) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.