Player Comparison

Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.

Andrew Robertson removeVictor Lindelöf remove
Age3231
PositionLeft-backCentre-back
Club · leagueLiverpool FC · Premier LeagueAston Villa · Premier League
League strength1.301.30
Team strength (Elo)16821721
League minutes1172 (34%)944 (28%)
G+A per 90 (raw)0.080.10
G+A per 90 (context-adjusted)0.090.06
Passing / defending / progressionData unavailableData unavailable
Performance percentile9491
Market value€7.0M€5.0M
Estimated acquisition€2.2M – €7.5M€1.9M – €4.7M
Model value€6.6M – €15.0M€4.6M – €13.9M
Projected value (24m)€1.7M – €4.3M€1.7M – €2.9M
Bargain Index5/10015/100
DevelopmentLowLow
Breakout probabilityn/a (age > 23)n/a (age > 23)
RiskHighHigh
Data confidenceMediumMedium
Value picture
Estimated acquisition€2.2M – €7.5M
Model value (performance-implied)€6.6M – €15.0M
Projected value (24 months)€1.7M – €4.3M
Dashed line: current market value (€7.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.
Estimated acquisition€1.9M – €4.7M
Model value (performance-implied)€4.6M – €13.9M
Projected value (24 months)€1.7M – €2.9M
Dashed line: current market value (€5.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.

What separates Andrew Robertson and Victor Lindelöf

  • Lindelöf is estimated to cost far less (€2.5M vs €4.3M mid-estimate).
  • On value for money the model prefers Lindelöf (Bargain Index 15 vs 5) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.