Player Comparison

Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.

Adam Dzwigala removeWagane Faye remove
Age3032
PositionCentre-backCentre-back
Club · leagueFC St. Pauli · BundesligaRAAL La Louvière · Jupiler Pro League
League strength0.940.65
Team strength (Elo)12831297
League minutes1295 (42%)1947 (72%)
G+A per 90 (raw)0.140.14
G+A per 90 (context-adjusted)0.120.13
Passing / defending / progressionData unavailableData unavailable
Performance percentile4428
Market value€800k€400k
Estimated acquisition€228k – €618k€126k – €332k
Model value€440k – €1.8M€197k – €668k
Projected value (24m)€319k – €765k€122k – €356k
Bargain Index83/10073/100
DevelopmentLowLow
Breakout probabilityn/a (age > 23)n/a (age > 23)
RiskModerateHigh
Data confidenceMediumMedium
Value picture
Estimated acquisition€228k – €618k
Model value (performance-implied)€440k – €1.8M
Projected value (24 months)€319k – €765k
Dashed line: current market value (€800k). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.
Estimated acquisition€126k – €332k
Model value (performance-implied)€197k – €668k
Projected value (24 months)€122k – €356k
Dashed line: current market value (€400k). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.

What separates Adam Dzwigala and Wagane Faye

  • Dzwigala plays in a stronger league (0.94 vs 0.65); the other's output carries more translation uncertainty.
  • Faye was used far more by the club (72% of minutes vs 42%).
  • Faye is estimated to cost far less (€168k vs €304k mid-estimate).
  • On value for money the model prefers Dzwigala (Bargain Index 83 vs 73) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
  • Risk differs: Dzwigala Moderate, Faye High.