Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Enis Bardhi remove | Jamie McGrath remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 31 | 29 |
| Position | Attacking midfielder | Attacking midfielder |
| Club · league | Konyaspor · Super Lig | Hibernian FC · Scottish Premiership |
| League strength | 0.40 | 0.31 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1230 | 1281 |
| League minutes | 2066 (68%) | 2269 (76%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.44 | 0.44 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.43 | 0.36 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 41 | 39 |
| Market value | €2.5M | €1.2M |
| Estimated acquisition | €562k – €1.7M | €416k – €1.1M |
| Model value | €579k – €1.5M | €616k – €1.7M |
| Projected value (24m) | €655k – €1.7M | €392k – €1.1M |
| Bargain Index | 21/100 | 56/100 |
| Development | Low | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | High | Moderate |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€562k – €1.7M Model value (performance-implied)€579k – €1.5M Projected value (24 months)€655k – €1.7M Dashed line: current market value (€2.5M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€416k – €1.1M Model value (performance-implied)€616k – €1.7M Projected value (24 months)€392k – €1.1M Dashed line: current market value (€1.2M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Enis Bardhi and Jamie McGrath
- On value for money the model prefers McGrath (Bargain Index 56 vs 21) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
- Risk differs: Bardhi High, McGrath Moderate.