Player Comparison

Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.

Dan Barlaser removeLukas Fadinger remove
Age2925
PositionDefensive midfielderDefensive midfielder
Club · leagueHibernian FC · Scottish PremiershipMotherwell FC · Scottish Premiership
League strength0.310.31
Team strength (Elo)12811245
League minutes2298 (77%)2570 (87%)
G+A per 90 (raw)0.120.10
G+A per 90 (context-adjusted)0.100.11
Passing / defending / progressionData unavailableData unavailable
Performance percentile2624
Market value€1.2M€350k
Estimated acquisition€291k – €1.3M€81k – €274k
Model value€392k – €1.8M€463k – €1.8M
Projected value (24m)€426k – €1.1M€315k – €453k
Bargain Index69/100100/100
DevelopmentLowLow
Breakout probabilityn/a (age > 23)n/a (age > 23)
RiskModerateHigh
Data confidenceMediumMedium
Value picture
Estimated acquisition€291k – €1.3M
Model value (performance-implied)€392k – €1.8M
Projected value (24 months)€426k – €1.1M
Dashed line: current market value (€1.2M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.
Estimated acquisition€81k – €274k
Model value (performance-implied)€463k – €1.8M
Projected value (24 months)€315k – €453k
Dashed line: current market value (€350k). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.

What separates Dan Barlaser and Lukas Fadinger

  • Fadinger is 4 years younger, which the models associate with more appreciation and resale potential.
  • Fadinger is estimated to cost far less (€108k vs €618k mid-estimate).
  • On value for money the model prefers Fadinger (Bargain Index 100 vs 69) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
  • Risk differs: Barlaser Moderate, Fadinger High.