Player Comparison

Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.

Jari Vandeputte removeSiebe Schrijvers remove
Age3029
PositionCentral midfielderCentral midfielder
Club · leagueUS Cremonese · Serie AOud-Heverlee Leuven · Jupiler Pro League
League strength0.930.65
Team strength (Elo)12991329
League minutes1952 (57%)1482 (55%)
G+A per 90 (raw)0.320.36
G+A per 90 (context-adjusted)0.390.37
Passing / defending / progressionData unavailableData unavailable
Performance percentile4545
Market value€3.0M€1.5M
Estimated acquisition€1.1M – €3.0M€368k – €1.1M
Model value€623k – €1.9M€798k – €3.7M
Projected value (24m)€809k – €2.6M€446k – €1.3M
Bargain Index21/10051/100
DevelopmentLowLow
Breakout probabilityn/a (age > 23)n/a (age > 23)
RiskLowHigh
Data confidenceMediumMedium
Value picture
Estimated acquisition€1.1M – €3.0M
Model value (performance-implied)€623k – €1.9M
Projected value (24 months)€809k – €2.6M
Dashed line: current market value (€3.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.
Estimated acquisition€368k – €1.1M
Model value (performance-implied)€798k – €3.7M
Projected value (24 months)€446k – €1.3M
Dashed line: current market value (€1.5M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.

What separates Jari Vandeputte and Siebe Schrijvers

  • Vandeputte plays in a stronger league (0.93 vs 0.65); the other's output carries more translation uncertainty.
  • Schrijvers is estimated to cost far less (€490k vs €1.7M mid-estimate).
  • On value for money the model prefers Schrijvers (Bargain Index 51 vs 21) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
  • Risk differs: Vandeputte Low, Schrijvers High.