Player Comparison

Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.

Timothy Castagne removeClément Lenglet remove
Age3031
PositionRight-backCentre-back
Club · leagueFulham FC · Premier LeagueAtlético de Madrid · Laliga
League strength1.300.95
Team strength (Elo)15761619
League minutes1842 (54%)1393 (41%)
G+A per 90 (raw)0.000.07
G+A per 90 (context-adjusted)0.060.06
Passing / defending / progressionData unavailableData unavailable
Performance percentile9094
Market value€8.0M€4.0M
Estimated acquisition€2.1M – €6.2M€1.3M – €3.3M
Model value€6.2M – €12.5M€6.8M – €23.2M
Projected value (24m)€2.4M – €4.3M€1.3M – €2.9M
Bargain Index18/10039/100
DevelopmentLowLow
Breakout probabilityn/a (age > 23)n/a (age > 23)
RiskModerateHigh
Data confidenceMediumMedium
Value picture
Estimated acquisition€2.1M – €6.2M
Model value (performance-implied)€6.2M – €12.5M
Projected value (24 months)€2.4M – €4.3M
Dashed line: current market value (€8.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.
Estimated acquisition€1.3M – €3.3M
Model value (performance-implied)€6.8M – €23.2M
Projected value (24 months)€1.3M – €2.9M
Dashed line: current market value (€4.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.

What separates Timothy Castagne and Clément Lenglet

  • Castagne plays in a stronger league (1.30 vs 0.95); the other's output carries more translation uncertainty.
  • Lenglet is estimated to cost far less (€1.8M vs €2.8M mid-estimate).
  • On value for money the model prefers Lenglet (Bargain Index 39 vs 18) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
  • Risk differs: Castagne Moderate, Lenglet High.