Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Miroslav Bogosavac remove | Sherel Floranus remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 29 | 27 |
| Position | Left-back | Left-back |
| Club · league | RFK Akhmat Grozny · Premier Liga | PEC Zwolle · Eredivisie |
| League strength | 0.56 | 0.43 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1279 | 1186 |
| League minutes | 2659 (99%) | 2801 (92%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.03 | 0.13 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.08 | 0.12 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 36 | 28 |
| Market value | €1.2M | €800k |
| Estimated acquisition | €299k – €896k | €192k – €662k |
| Model value | €681k – €1.0M | €614k – €786k |
| Projected value (24m) | €441k – €1.1M | €450k – €836k |
| Bargain Index | 65/100 | 91/100 |
| Development | Low | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | High | Moderate |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€299k – €896k Model value (performance-implied)€681k – €1.0M Projected value (24 months)€441k – €1.1M Dashed line: current market value (€1.2M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€192k – €662k Model value (performance-implied)€614k – €786k Projected value (24 months)€450k – €836k Dashed line: current market value (€800k). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Miroslav Bogosavac and Sherel Floranus
- Floranus is estimated to cost far less (€257k vs €399k mid-estimate).
- On value for money the model prefers Floranus (Bargain Index 91 vs 65) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
- Risk differs: Bogosavac High, Floranus Moderate.