Player Comparison

Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.

Laurent Lemoine removeKobe Cools remove
Age2828
PositionCentre-backCentre-back
Club · leagueZulte Waregem · Jupiler Pro LeagueFCV Dender EH · Jupiler Pro League
League strength0.650.65
Team strength (Elo)12281207
League minutes1176 (44%)1314 (49%)
G+A per 90 (raw)0.000.00
G+A per 90 (context-adjusted)0.040.04
Passing / defending / progressionData unavailableData unavailable
Performance percentile619
Market value€800k€600k
Estimated acquisition€262k – €606k€170k – €439k
Model value€309k – €836k€389k – €1.2M
Projected value (24m)€346k – €831k€218k – €570k
Bargain Index86/10073/100
DevelopmentLowLow
Breakout probabilityn/a (age > 23)n/a (age > 23)
RiskModerateHigh
Data confidenceMediumMedium
Value picture
Estimated acquisition€262k – €606k
Model value (performance-implied)€309k – €836k
Projected value (24 months)€346k – €831k
Dashed line: current market value (€800k). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.
Estimated acquisition€170k – €439k
Model value (performance-implied)€389k – €1.2M
Projected value (24 months)€218k – €570k
Dashed line: current market value (€600k). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.

What separates Laurent Lemoine and Kobe Cools

  • Cools is estimated to cost far less (€226k vs €349k mid-estimate).
  • On value for money the model prefers Lemoine (Bargain Index 86 vs 73) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
  • Risk differs: Lemoine Moderate, Cools High.