Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Dominic Calvert-Lewin remove | Richarlison remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 29 | 29 |
| Position | Striker | Striker |
| Club · league | Leeds United · Premier League | Tottenham Hotspur · Premier League |
| League strength | 1.30 | 1.30 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1521 | 1564 |
| League minutes | 2730 (80%) | 1960 (57%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.49 | 0.69 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.65 | 0.64 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 94 | 94 |
| Market value | €22.0M | €25.0M |
| Estimated acquisition | €13.7M – €29.8M | €10.3M – €27.1M |
| Model value | €17.4M – €33.8M | €12.4M – €45.3M |
| Projected value (24m) | €7.0M – €14.4M | €7.7M – €16.4M |
| Bargain Index | 0/100 | 25/100 |
| Development | Low | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Low | Low |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€13.7M – €29.8M Model value (performance-implied)€17.4M – €33.8M Projected value (24 months)€7.0M – €14.4M Dashed line: current market value (€22.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€10.3M – €27.1M Model value (performance-implied)€12.4M – €45.3M Projected value (24 months)€7.7M – €16.4M Dashed line: current market value (€25.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Dominic Calvert-Lewin and Richarlison
- Calvert-Lewin was used far more by the club (80% of minutes vs 57%).
- Richarlison is estimated to cost far less (€13.7M vs €20.9M mid-estimate).
- On value for money the model prefers Richarlison (Bargain Index 25 vs 0) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.