Player Comparison

Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.

Vito van Crooij removeChris Cadden remove
Age3029
PositionAttacking midfielderRight midfielder
Club · leagueSparta Rotterdam · EredivisieHibernian FC · Scottish Premiership
League strength0.430.31
Team strength (Elo)12501281
League minutes999 (33%)1149 (39%)
G+A per 90 (raw)0.180.23
G+A per 90 (context-adjusted)0.260.16
Passing / defending / progressionData unavailableData unavailable
Performance percentile3031
Market value€900k€500k
Estimated acquisition€194k – €646k€123k – €393k
Model value€432k – €883k€534k – €1.1M
Projected value (24m)€372k – €754k€178k – €452k
Bargain Index64/10085/100
DevelopmentLowLow
Breakout probabilityn/a (age > 23)n/a (age > 23)
RiskVery HighHigh
Data confidenceMediumMedium
Value picture
Estimated acquisition€194k – €646k
Model value (performance-implied)€432k – €883k
Projected value (24 months)€372k – €754k
Dashed line: current market value (€900k). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.
Estimated acquisition€123k – €393k
Model value (performance-implied)€534k – €1.1M
Projected value (24 months)€178k – €452k
Dashed line: current market value (€500k). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.

What separates Vito van Crooij and Chris Cadden

  • Crooij has higher context-adjusted goal contributions (0.26 vs 0.16 per 90).
  • Cadden is estimated to cost far less (€164k vs €259k mid-estimate).
  • On value for money the model prefers Cadden (Bargain Index 85 vs 64) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
  • Risk differs: Crooij Very High, Cadden High.