Player Comparison

Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.

Orbelín Pineda removeRob Schoofs remove
Age3032
PositionCentral midfielderCentral midfielder
Club · leagueAthlitiki Enosi Konstantinoupoleos · Super League 1Union Saint-Gilloise · Jupiler Pro League
League strength0.420.65
Team strength (Elo)15121505
League minutes1982 (85%)1630 (60%)
G+A per 90 (raw)0.230.39
G+A per 90 (context-adjusted)0.170.23
Passing / defending / progressionData unavailableData unavailable
Performance percentile7370
Market value€7.0M€2.0M
Estimated acquisition€1.7M – €5.9M€658k – €1.8M
Model value€1.5M – €6.1M€932k – €3.8M
Projected value (24m)€1.8M – €4.7M€434k – €1.1M
Bargain Index44/10010/100
DevelopmentLowLow
Breakout probabilityn/a (age > 23)n/a (age > 23)
RiskModerateHigh
Data confidenceMediumMedium
Value picture
Estimated acquisition€1.7M – €5.9M
Model value (performance-implied)€1.5M – €6.1M
Projected value (24 months)€1.8M – €4.7M
Dashed line: current market value (€7.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.
Estimated acquisition€658k – €1.8M
Model value (performance-implied)€932k – €3.8M
Projected value (24 months)€434k – €1.1M
Dashed line: current market value (€2.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.

What separates Orbelín Pineda and Rob Schoofs

  • Pineda is 2 years younger, which the models associate with more appreciation and resale potential.
  • Schoofs plays in a stronger league (0.65 vs 0.42); the other's output carries more translation uncertainty.
  • Pineda was used far more by the club (85% of minutes vs 60%).
  • Schoofs is estimated to cost far less (€1.1M vs €2.3M mid-estimate).
  • On value for money the model prefers Pineda (Bargain Index 44 vs 10) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
  • Risk differs: Pineda Moderate, Schoofs High.