Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Tim Siersleben remove | Benedikt Gimber remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 26 | 29 |
| Position | Centre-back | Centre-back |
| Club · league | 1. Fußballclub Heidenheim 1846 · Bundesliga | 1. Fußballclub Heidenheim 1846 · Bundesliga |
| League strength | 0.94 | 0.94 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1323 | 1323 |
| League minutes | 1082 (35%) | 1437 (47%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.04 | 0.03 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 47 | 57 |
| Market value | €1.8M | €1.5M |
| Estimated acquisition | €659k – €2.3M | €480k – €1.6M |
| Model value | €858k – €2.9M | €985k – €3.7M |
| Projected value (24m) | €818k – €1.9M | €565k – €1.4M |
| Bargain Index | 50/100 | 36/100 |
| Development | Low | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Moderate | Moderate |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€659k – €2.3M Model value (performance-implied)€858k – €2.9M Projected value (24 months)€818k – €1.9M Dashed line: current market value (€1.8M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€480k – €1.6M Model value (performance-implied)€985k – €3.7M Projected value (24 months)€565k – €1.4M Dashed line: current market value (€1.5M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Tim Siersleben and Benedikt Gimber
- Siersleben is 3 years younger, which the models associate with more appreciation and resale potential.
- On value for money the model prefers Siersleben (Bargain Index 50 vs 36) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.