Player Comparison

Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.

Thibault De Smet removeLudwig Augustinsson remove
Age2832
PositionLeft-backLeft-back
Club · leagueParis FC · Ligue 1RSC Anderlecht · Jupiler Pro League
League strength0.880.65
Team strength (Elo)14541393
League minutes1148 (38%)1445 (54%)
G+A per 90 (raw)0.080.13
G+A per 90 (context-adjusted)0.140.11
Passing / defending / progressionData unavailableData unavailable
Performance percentile4849
Market value€1.8M€1.5M
Estimated acquisition€531k – €1.5M€396k – €1.1M
Model value€806k – €2.3M€641k – €1.9M
Projected value (24m)€673k – €1.9M€351k – €925k
Bargain Index81/10014/100
DevelopmentLowLow
Breakout probabilityn/a (age > 23)n/a (age > 23)
RiskHighHigh
Data confidenceMediumMedium
Value picture
Estimated acquisition€531k – €1.5M
Model value (performance-implied)€806k – €2.3M
Projected value (24 months)€673k – €1.9M
Dashed line: current market value (€1.8M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.
Estimated acquisition€396k – €1.1M
Model value (performance-implied)€641k – €1.9M
Projected value (24 months)€351k – €925k
Dashed line: current market value (€1.5M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.

What separates Thibault De Smet and Ludwig Augustinsson

  • Smet is 4 years younger, which the models associate with more appreciation and resale potential.
  • Smet plays in a stronger league (0.88 vs 0.65); the other's output carries more translation uncertainty.
  • Augustinsson was used far more by the club (54% of minutes vs 38%).
  • On value for money the model prefers Smet (Bargain Index 81 vs 14) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.