Player Comparison

Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.

Joe Willock removeRyan Christie remove
Age2631
PositionCentral midfielderCentral midfielder
Club · leagueNewcastle United · Premier LeagueAFC Bournemouth · Premier League
League strength1.301.30
Team strength (Elo)16311643
League minutes980 (29%)986 (29%)
G+A per 90 (raw)0.180.18
G+A per 90 (context-adjusted)0.190.19
Passing / defending / progressionData unavailableData unavailable
Performance percentile8992
Market value€14.0M€8.0M
Estimated acquisition€4.9M – €12.4M€2.8M – €7.9M
Model value€16.1M – €25.6M€7.3M – €23.7M
Projected value (24m)€5.3M – €15.1M€2.1M – €4.6M
Bargain Index85/10011/100
DevelopmentLowLow
Breakout probabilityn/a (age > 23)n/a (age > 23)
RiskModerateHigh
Data confidenceMediumMedium
Value picture
Estimated acquisition€4.9M – €12.4M
Model value (performance-implied)€16.1M – €25.6M
Projected value (24 months)€5.3M – €15.1M
Dashed line: current market value (€14.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.
Estimated acquisition€2.8M – €7.9M
Model value (performance-implied)€7.3M – €23.7M
Projected value (24 months)€2.1M – €4.6M
Dashed line: current market value (€8.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.

What separates Joe Willock and Ryan Christie

  • Willock is 4 years younger, which the models associate with more appreciation and resale potential.
  • Christie is estimated to cost far less (€4.3M vs €6.5M mid-estimate).
  • On value for money the model prefers Willock (Bargain Index 85 vs 11) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
  • Risk differs: Willock Moderate, Christie High.