Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Ché Adams remove | Oliver Burke remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 29 | 29 |
| Position | Striker | Striker |
| Club · league | Torino FC · Serie A | 1.FC Union Berlin · Bundesliga |
| League strength | 0.93 | 0.94 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1419 | 1392 |
| League minutes | 1897 (56%) | 1674 (55%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.43 | 0.43 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.52 | 0.48 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 81 | 68 |
| Market value | €5.0M | €3.0M |
| Estimated acquisition | €1.7M – €5.2M | €1.3M – €3.7M |
| Model value | €7.7M – €16.2M | €3.8M – €9.7M |
| Projected value (24m) | €1.3M – €3.4M | €969k – €2.8M |
| Bargain Index | 32/100 | 19/100 |
| Development | Low | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Moderate | Low |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€1.7M – €5.2M Model value (performance-implied)€7.7M – €16.2M Projected value (24 months)€1.3M – €3.4M Dashed line: current market value (€5.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€1.3M – €3.7M Model value (performance-implied)€3.8M – €9.7M Projected value (24 months)€969k – €2.8M Dashed line: current market value (€3.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Ché Adams and Oliver Burke
- On value for money the model prefers Adams (Bargain Index 32 vs 19) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
- Risk differs: Adams Moderate, Burke Low.