Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Daichi Kamada remove | Will Hughes remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 29 | 31 |
| Position | Central midfielder | Central midfielder |
| Club · league | Crystal Palace · Premier League | Crystal Palace · Premier League |
| League strength | 1.30 | 1.30 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1589 | 1589 |
| League minutes | 1909 (56%) | 1568 (46%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.05 | 0.00 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.09 | 0.08 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 93 | 93 |
| Market value | €10.0M | €5.0M |
| Estimated acquisition | €2.6M – €7.9M | €1.2M – €4.0M |
| Model value | €11.2M – €18.6M | €9.6M – €21.0M |
| Projected value (24m) | €2.8M – €6.8M | €1.3M – €3.3M |
| Bargain Index | 40/100 | 13/100 |
| Development | Low | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Low | High |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€2.6M – €7.9M Model value (performance-implied)€11.2M – €18.6M Projected value (24 months)€2.8M – €6.8M Dashed line: current market value (€10.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€1.2M – €4.0M Model value (performance-implied)€9.6M – €21.0M Projected value (24 months)€1.3M – €3.3M Dashed line: current market value (€5.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Daichi Kamada and Will Hughes
- Hughes is estimated to cost far less (€1.7M vs €3.4M mid-estimate).
- On value for money the model prefers Kamada (Bargain Index 40 vs 13) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
- Risk differs: Kamada Low, Hughes High.