Player Comparison

Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.

Pablo Fornals removeAdrien Thomasson remove
Age3032
PositionCentral midfielderCentral midfielder
Club · leagueReal Betis Balompié · LaligaRC Lens · Ligue 1
League strength0.950.88
Team strength (Elo)15491569
League minutes2866 (84%)2691 (88%)
G+A per 90 (raw)0.470.43
G+A per 90 (context-adjusted)0.370.34
Passing / defending / progressionData unavailableData unavailable
Performance percentile9590
Market value€8.0M€4.0M
Estimated acquisition€3.5M – €8.2M€1.6M – €4.0M
Model value€11.2M – €27.8M€5.0M – €7.6M
Projected value (24m)€2.5M – €6.8M€664k – €2.2M
Bargain Index37/10012/100
DevelopmentLowLow
Breakout probabilityn/a (age > 23)n/a (age > 23)
RiskLowHigh
Data confidenceMediumMedium
Value picture
Estimated acquisition€3.5M – €8.2M
Model value (performance-implied)€11.2M – €27.8M
Projected value (24 months)€2.5M – €6.8M
Dashed line: current market value (€8.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.
Estimated acquisition€1.6M – €4.0M
Model value (performance-implied)€5.0M – €7.6M
Projected value (24 months)€664k – €2.2M
Dashed line: current market value (€4.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.

What separates Pablo Fornals and Adrien Thomasson

  • Fornals is 2 years younger, which the models associate with more appreciation and resale potential.
  • Thomasson is estimated to cost far less (€2.3M vs €5.0M mid-estimate).
  • On value for money the model prefers Fornals (Bargain Index 37 vs 12) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
  • Risk differs: Fornals Low, Thomasson High.