Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Peer Koopmeiners remove | Thomas van den Belt remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 26 | 25 |
| Position | Defensive midfielder | Defensive midfielder |
| Club · league | AZ Alkmaar · Eredivisie | FC Twente Enschede · Eredivisie |
| League strength | 0.43 | 0.43 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1393 | 1403 |
| League minutes | 2134 (70%) | 2193 (72%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.08 | 0.25 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.05 | 0.13 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 50 | 39 |
| Market value | €12.0M | €4.5M |
| Estimated acquisition | €6.9M – €13.6M | €2.3M – €6.5M |
| Model value | €1.1M – €4.6M | €696k – €2.6M |
| Projected value (24m) | €5.1M – €13.9M | €2.4M – €7.6M |
| Bargain Index | 17/100 | 61/100 |
| Development | Low | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Moderate | Moderate |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€6.9M – €13.6M Model value (performance-implied)€1.1M – €4.6M Projected value (24 months)€5.1M – €13.9M Dashed line: current market value (€12.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€2.3M – €6.5M Model value (performance-implied)€696k – €2.6M Projected value (24 months)€2.4M – €7.6M Dashed line: current market value (€4.5M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Peer Koopmeiners and Thomas van den Belt
- Belt is estimated to cost far less (€3.9M vs €10.0M mid-estimate).
- On value for money the model prefers Belt (Bargain Index 61 vs 17) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.