Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| In-beom Hwang remove | Christopher Martins remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 29 | 29 |
| Position | Defensive midfielder | Defensive midfielder |
| Club · league | Feyenoord Rotterdam · Eredivisie | FK Spartak Moskva · Premier Liga |
| League strength | 0.43 | 0.56 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1423 | 1443 |
| League minutes | 984 (32%) | 1122 (42%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.37 | 0.40 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.14 | 0.20 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 48 | 53 |
| Market value | €7.0M | €3.5M |
| Estimated acquisition | €2.0M – €7.2M | €968k – €3.5M |
| Model value | €1.2M – €3.0M | €1.2M – €4.1M |
| Projected value (24m) | €1.6M – €4.5M | €1.0M – €3.0M |
| Bargain Index | 7/100 | 25/100 |
| Development | Low | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Moderate | High |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€2.0M – €7.2M Model value (performance-implied)€1.2M – €3.0M Projected value (24 months)€1.6M – €4.5M Dashed line: current market value (€7.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€968k – €3.5M Model value (performance-implied)€1.2M – €4.1M Projected value (24 months)€1.0M – €3.0M Dashed line: current market value (€3.5M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates In-beom Hwang and Christopher Martins
- Martins is estimated to cost far less (€2.2M vs €4.4M mid-estimate).
- On value for money the model prefers Martins (Bargain Index 25 vs 7) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
- Risk differs: Hwang Moderate, Martins High.