Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Guus Til remove | Chiquinho remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 28 | 30 |
| Position | Attacking midfielder | Attacking midfielder |
| Club · league | PSV Eindhoven · Eredivisie | Olympiakos Syndesmos Filathlon Peiraios · Super League 1 |
| League strength | 0.43 | 0.42 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1606 | 1550 |
| League minutes | 2247 (73%) | 1514 (65%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.76 | 0.48 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.30 | 0.27 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 86 | 79 |
| Market value | €15.0M | €5.0M |
| Estimated acquisition | €7.1M – €15.8M | €1.4M – €4.9M |
| Model value | €10.3M – €27.5M | €2.2M – €6.8M |
| Projected value (24m) | €5.0M – €13.4M | €1.2M – €2.9M |
| Bargain Index | 19/100 | 8/100 |
| Development | Low | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Low | Moderate |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€7.1M – €15.8M Model value (performance-implied)€10.3M – €27.5M Projected value (24 months)€5.0M – €13.4M Dashed line: current market value (€15.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€1.4M – €4.9M Model value (performance-implied)€2.2M – €6.8M Projected value (24 months)€1.2M – €2.9M Dashed line: current market value (€5.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Guus Til and Chiquinho
- Til is 2 years younger, which the models associate with more appreciation and resale potential.
- Chiquinho is estimated to cost far less (€2.6M vs €10.6M mid-estimate).
- On value for money the model prefers Til (Bargain Index 19 vs 8) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
- Risk differs: Til Low, Chiquinho Moderate.