Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Rodrigo Escoval remove | Kobe Cools remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 29 | 28 |
| Position | Centre-back | Centre-back |
| Club · league | Akron Togliatti · Premier Liga | FCV Dender EH · Jupiler Pro League |
| League strength | 0.56 | 0.65 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1212 | 1207 |
| League minutes | 920 (34%) | 1314 (49%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.05 | 0.04 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 20 | 19 |
| Market value | €800k | €600k |
| Estimated acquisition | €202k – €568k | €170k – €439k |
| Model value | €424k – €813k | €389k – €1.2M |
| Projected value (24m) | €370k – €687k | €218k – €570k |
| Bargain Index | 86/100 | 73/100 |
| Development | Low | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Very High | High |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€202k – €568k Model value (performance-implied)€424k – €813k Projected value (24 months)€370k – €687k Dashed line: current market value (€800k). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€170k – €439k Model value (performance-implied)€389k – €1.2M Projected value (24 months)€218k – €570k Dashed line: current market value (€600k). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Rodrigo Escoval and Kobe Cools
- On value for money the model prefers Escoval (Bargain Index 86 vs 73) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
- Risk differs: Escoval Very High, Cools High.