Player Comparison

Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.

Phil Foden removeMikkel Damsgaard remove
Age2625
PositionAttacking midfielderAttacking midfielder
Club · leagueManchester City · Premier LeagueBrentford FC · Premier League
League strength1.301.30
Team strength (Elo)18091612
League minutes2085 (61%)2058 (60%)
G+A per 90 (raw)0.520.35
G+A per 90 (context-adjusted)0.340.36
Passing / defending / progressionData unavailableData unavailable
Performance percentile10097
Market value€70.0M€30.0M
Estimated acquisition€26.7M – €69.5M€13.6M – €34.2M
Model value€60.7M – €81.6M€34.3M – €60.0M
Projected value (24m)€27.5M – €65.3M€15.7M – €34.2M
Bargain Index78/10025/100
DevelopmentLowModerate
Breakout probabilityn/a (age > 23)n/a (age > 23)
RiskLowLow
Data confidenceMediumMedium
Value picture
Estimated acquisition€26.7M – €69.5M
Model value (performance-implied)€60.7M – €81.6M
Projected value (24 months)€27.5M – €65.3M
Dashed line: current market value (€70.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.
Estimated acquisition€13.6M – €34.2M
Model value (performance-implied)€34.3M – €60.0M
Projected value (24 months)€15.7M – €34.2M
Dashed line: current market value (€30.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.

What separates Phil Foden and Mikkel Damsgaard

  • On value for money the model prefers Foden (Bargain Index 78 vs 25) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.