Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Daan Heymans remove | Omri Gandelman remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 27 | 26 |
| Position | Attacking midfielder | Attacking midfielder |
| Club · league | KRC Genk · Jupiler Pro League | KAA Gent · Jupiler Pro League |
| League strength | 0.65 | 0.65 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1471 | 1383 |
| League minutes | 1649 (61%) | 2407 (70%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.66 | 0.41 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.48 | 0.49 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 69 | 56 |
| Market value | €6.0M | €3.0M |
| Estimated acquisition | €2.9M – €7.1M | €1.3M – €3.1M |
| Model value | €3.6M – €7.5M | €1.8M – €8.5M |
| Projected value (24m) | €2.5M – €6.2M | €1.6M – €3.8M |
| Bargain Index | 28/100 | 71/100 |
| Development | Low | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Moderate | Low |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€2.9M – €7.1M Model value (performance-implied)€3.6M – €7.5M Projected value (24 months)€2.5M – €6.2M Dashed line: current market value (€6.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€1.3M – €3.1M Model value (performance-implied)€1.8M – €8.5M Projected value (24 months)€1.6M – €3.8M Dashed line: current market value (€3.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Daan Heymans and Omri Gandelman
- Gandelman is estimated to cost far less (€2.0M vs €5.2M mid-estimate).
- On value for money the model prefers Gandelman (Bargain Index 71 vs 28) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
- Risk differs: Heymans Moderate, Gandelman Low.