Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Khéphren Thuram remove | Éderson remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 25 | 26 |
| Position | Central midfielder | Central midfielder |
| Club · league | Juventus FC · Serie A | Atalanta BC · Serie A |
| League strength | 0.93 | 0.93 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1614 | 1588 |
| League minutes | 2453 (72%) | 2235 (65%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.22 | 0.12 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.16 | 0.11 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 91 | 90 |
| Market value | €38.0M | €45.0M |
| Estimated acquisition | €22.8M – €45.6M | €16.8M – €37.5M |
| Model value | €16.4M – €53.4M | €14.0M – €39.0M |
| Projected value (24m) | €19.6M – €50.4M | €23.9M – €48.7M |
| Bargain Index | 36/100 | 78/100 |
| Development | Moderate | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Low | Moderate |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€22.8M – €45.6M Model value (performance-implied)€16.4M – €53.4M Projected value (24 months)€19.6M – €50.4M Dashed line: current market value (€38.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€16.8M – €37.5M Model value (performance-implied)€14.0M – €39.0M Projected value (24 months)€23.9M – €48.7M Dashed line: current market value (€45.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Khéphren Thuram and Éderson
- Éderson is estimated to cost far less (€22.4M vs €35.1M mid-estimate).
- On value for money the model prefers Éderson (Bargain Index 78 vs 36) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
- Risk differs: Thuram Low, Éderson Moderate.