Player Comparison

Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.

Luke McCowan removeOzan Tufan remove
Age2831
PositionCentral midfielderCentral midfielder
Club · leagueCeltic FC · Scottish PremiershipTrabzonspor · Super Lig
League strength0.310.40
Team strength (Elo)14061368
League minutes1169 (39%)1430 (47%)
G+A per 90 (raw)0.150.19
G+A per 90 (context-adjusted)0.140.15
Passing / defending / progressionData unavailableData unavailable
Performance percentile5345
Market value€1.5M€1.5M
Estimated acquisition€458k – €1.4M€349k – €1.1M
Model value€1.2M – €4.6M€472k – €1.5M
Projected value (24m)€531k – €1.6M€317k – €1.0M
Bargain Index59/10050/100
DevelopmentLowLow
Breakout probabilityn/a (age > 23)n/a (age > 23)
RiskHighVery High
Data confidenceMediumMedium
Value picture
Estimated acquisition€458k – €1.4M
Model value (performance-implied)€1.2M – €4.6M
Projected value (24 months)€531k – €1.6M
Dashed line: current market value (€1.5M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.
Estimated acquisition€349k – €1.1M
Model value (performance-implied)€472k – €1.5M
Projected value (24 months)€317k – €1.0M
Dashed line: current market value (€1.5M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.

What separates Luke McCowan and Ozan Tufan

  • McCowan is 3 years younger, which the models associate with more appreciation and resale potential.
  • Tufan is estimated to cost far less (€466k vs €870k mid-estimate).
  • Risk differs: McCowan High, Tufan Very High.