Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Matteo Tramoni remove | Woo-yeong Jeong remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 26 | 26 |
| Position | Attacking midfielder | Attacking midfielder |
| Club · league | Pisa Sporting Club · Serie A | 1.FC Union Berlin · Bundesliga |
| League strength | 0.93 | 0.94 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1260 | 1392 |
| League minutes | 1610 (47%) | 1193 (39%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.22 | 0.38 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.43 | 0.45 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 42 | 58 |
| Market value | €4.5M | €3.5M |
| Estimated acquisition | €2.0M – €4.8M | €1.4M – €4.5M |
| Model value | €596k – €2.3M | €2.5M – €6.3M |
| Projected value (24m) | €1.8M – €4.9M | €1.5M – €3.9M |
| Bargain Index | 37/100 | 53/100 |
| Development | Low | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Low | Moderate |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€2.0M – €4.8M Model value (performance-implied)€596k – €2.3M Projected value (24 months)€1.8M – €4.9M Dashed line: current market value (€4.5M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€1.4M – €4.5M Model value (performance-implied)€2.5M – €6.3M Projected value (24 months)€1.5M – €3.9M Dashed line: current market value (€3.5M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Matteo Tramoni and Woo-yeong Jeong
- On value for money the model prefers Jeong (Bargain Index 53 vs 37) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
- Risk differs: Tramoni Low, Jeong Moderate.