Player Comparison

Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.

Eberechi Eze removePhil Foden remove
Age2826
PositionAttacking midfielderAttacking midfielder
Club · leagueArsenal FC · Premier LeagueManchester City · Premier League
League strength1.301.30
Team strength (Elo)18631809
League minutes1900 (56%)2085 (61%)
G+A per 90 (raw)0.430.52
G+A per 90 (context-adjusted)0.260.34
Passing / defending / progressionData unavailableData unavailable
Performance percentile99100
Market value€65.0M€70.0M
Estimated acquisition€26.3M – €78.9M€26.7M – €69.5M
Model value€43.1M – €85.3M€60.7M – €81.6M
Projected value (24m)€29.0M – €57.7M€27.5M – €65.3M
Bargain Index29/10078/100
DevelopmentLowLow
Breakout probabilityn/a (age > 23)n/a (age > 23)
RiskLowLow
Data confidenceMediumMedium
Value picture
Estimated acquisition€26.3M – €78.9M
Model value (performance-implied)€43.1M – €85.3M
Projected value (24 months)€29.0M – €57.7M
Dashed line: current market value (€65.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.
Estimated acquisition€26.7M – €69.5M
Model value (performance-implied)€60.7M – €81.6M
Projected value (24 months)€27.5M – €65.3M
Dashed line: current market value (€70.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.

What separates Eberechi Eze and Phil Foden

  • Foden has higher context-adjusted goal contributions (0.34 vs 0.26 per 90).
  • On value for money the model prefers Foden (Bargain Index 78 vs 29) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.