Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Nikita Glushkov remove | Ismael Silva remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 27 | 31 |
| Position | Central midfielder | Central midfielder |
| Club · league | Dinamo Makhachkala · Premier Liga | RFK Akhmat Grozny · Premier Liga |
| League strength | 0.56 | 0.56 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1214 | 1279 |
| League minutes | 2642 (98%) | 2217 (82%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.07 | 0.04 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.14 | 0.11 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 27 | 36 |
| Market value | €900k | €800k |
| Estimated acquisition | €232k – €678k | €188k – €637k |
| Model value | €776k – €1.5M | €526k – €805k |
| Projected value (24m) | €433k – €971k | €280k – €529k |
| Bargain Index | 90/100 | 37/100 |
| Development | Low | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | High | High |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€232k – €678k Model value (performance-implied)€776k – €1.5M Projected value (24 months)€433k – €971k Dashed line: current market value (€900k). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€188k – €637k Model value (performance-implied)€526k – €805k Projected value (24 months)€280k – €529k Dashed line: current market value (€800k). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Nikita Glushkov and Ismael Silva
- Glushkov is 4 years younger, which the models associate with more appreciation and resale potential.
- Glushkov was used far more by the club (98% of minutes vs 82%).
- On value for money the model prefers Glushkov (Bargain Index 90 vs 37) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.