Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Anouar Ait El Hadj remove | Artem Karpukas remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 24 | 24 |
| Position | Attacking midfielder | Defensive midfielder |
| Club · league | Union Saint-Gilloise · Jupiler Pro League | Футбольный клуб "Локомотив" Москва · Premier Liga |
| League strength | 0.65 | 0.56 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1570 | 1418 |
| League minutes | 1963 (73%) | 2145 (79%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.09 | 0.13 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.14 | 0.09 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 65 | 51 |
| Market value | €5.0M | €7.0M |
| Estimated acquisition | €2.7M – €7.0M | €3.0M – €8.0M |
| Model value | €4.2M – €13.5M | €1.4M – €10.0M |
| Projected value (24m) | €2.8M – €7.9M | €3.3M – €10.3M |
| Bargain Index | 60/100 | 85/100 |
| Development | Moderate | Moderate |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Low | High |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€2.7M – €7.0M Model value (performance-implied)€4.2M – €13.5M Projected value (24 months)€2.8M – €7.9M Dashed line: current market value (€5.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€3.0M – €8.0M Model value (performance-implied)€1.4M – €10.0M Projected value (24 months)€3.3M – €10.3M Dashed line: current market value (€7.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Anouar Ait El Hadj and Artem Karpukas
- On value for money the model prefers Karpukas (Bargain Index 85 vs 60) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
- Risk differs: Hadj Low, Karpukas High.