Player Comparison

Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.

Mujaid Sadick removeFilipe Relvas remove
Age2626
PositionCentre-backCentre-back
Club · leagueKRC Genk · Jupiler Pro LeagueAthlitiki Enosi Konstantinoupoleos · Super League 1
League strength0.650.42
Team strength (Elo)14711512
League minutes2473 (92%)1878 (80%)
G+A per 90 (raw)0.070.05
G+A per 90 (context-adjusted)0.050.04
Passing / defending / progressionData unavailableData unavailable
Performance percentile7360
Market value€5.0M€4.5M
Estimated acquisition€2.4M – €6.3M€2.2M – €5.9M
Model value€3.4M – €10.5M€1.4M – €7.8M
Projected value (24m)€2.4M – €7.0M€2.1M – €6.1M
Bargain Index45/10060/100
DevelopmentLowLow
Breakout probabilityn/a (age > 23)n/a (age > 23)
RiskLowLow
Data confidenceMediumMedium
Value picture
Estimated acquisition€2.4M – €6.3M
Model value (performance-implied)€3.4M – €10.5M
Projected value (24 months)€2.4M – €7.0M
Dashed line: current market value (€5.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.
Estimated acquisition€2.2M – €5.9M
Model value (performance-implied)€1.4M – €7.8M
Projected value (24 months)€2.1M – €6.1M
Dashed line: current market value (€4.5M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.

What separates Mujaid Sadick and Filipe Relvas

  • Sadick plays in a stronger league (0.65 vs 0.42); the other's output carries more translation uncertainty.
  • On value for money the model prefers Relvas (Bargain Index 60 vs 45) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.