Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Miguel Crespo remove | Ozan Tufan remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 29 | 31 |
| Position | Central midfielder | Central midfielder |
| Club · league | Basaksehir FK · Super Lig | Trabzonspor · Super Lig |
| League strength | 0.40 | 0.40 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1357 | 1368 |
| League minutes | 1104 (36%) | 1430 (47%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.41 | 0.19 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.28 | 0.15 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 34 | 45 |
| Market value | €2.0M | €1.5M |
| Estimated acquisition | €473k – €1.5M | €349k – €1.1M |
| Model value | €756k – €1.8M | €472k – €1.5M |
| Projected value (24m) | €628k – €1.7M | €317k – €1.0M |
| Bargain Index | 67/100 | 50/100 |
| Development | Low | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | High | Very High |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€473k – €1.5M Model value (performance-implied)€756k – €1.8M Projected value (24 months)€628k – €1.7M Dashed line: current market value (€2.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€349k – €1.1M Model value (performance-implied)€472k – €1.5M Projected value (24 months)€317k – €1.0M Dashed line: current market value (€1.5M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Miguel Crespo and Ozan Tufan
- Crespo has higher context-adjusted goal contributions (0.28 vs 0.15 per 90).
- On value for money the model prefers Crespo (Bargain Index 67 vs 50) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
- Risk differs: Crespo High, Tufan Very High.