Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Emmanuel Longelo remove | Boy Kemper remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 25 | 27 |
| Position | Left-back | Left-back |
| Club · league | Motherwell FC · Scottish Premiership | NAC Breda · Eredivisie |
| League strength | 0.31 | 0.43 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1245 | 1118 |
| League minutes | 2282 (77%) | 2821 (92%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.39 | 0.29 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.28 | 0.29 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 28 | 25 |
| Market value | €1.5M | €1.0M |
| Estimated acquisition | €474k – €1.3M | €286k – €1.1M |
| Model value | €460k – €1.4M | €510k – €764k |
| Projected value (24m) | €752k – €2.6M | €584k – €1.5M |
| Bargain Index | 98/100 | 82/100 |
| Development | Low | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | High | Moderate |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€474k – €1.3M Model value (performance-implied)€460k – €1.4M Projected value (24 months)€752k – €2.6M Dashed line: current market value (€1.5M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€286k – €1.1M Model value (performance-implied)€510k – €764k Projected value (24 months)€584k – €1.5M Dashed line: current market value (€1.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Emmanuel Longelo and Boy Kemper
- Kemper was used far more by the club (92% of minutes vs 77%).
- On value for money the model prefers Longelo (Bargain Index 98 vs 82) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
- Risk differs: Longelo High, Kemper Moderate.