Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Bremer remove | Marc Oliver Kempf remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 29 | 31 |
| Position | Centre-back | Centre-back |
| Club · league | Juventus FC · Serie A | Como 1907 · Serie A |
| League strength | 0.93 | 0.93 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1614 | 1589 |
| League minutes | 2175 (64%) | 2323 (68%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.29 | 0.19 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.18 | 0.15 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 85 | 85 |
| Market value | €35.0M | €3.5M |
| Estimated acquisition | €19.2M – €35.8M | €1.2M – €3.0M |
| Model value | €4.1M – €16.7M | €3.3M – €10.6M |
| Projected value (24m) | €10.3M – €21.8M | €1.3M – €2.7M |
| Bargain Index | 2/100 | 65/100 |
| Development | Low | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Low | Moderate |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€19.2M – €35.8M Model value (performance-implied)€4.1M – €16.7M Projected value (24 months)€10.3M – €21.8M Dashed line: current market value (€35.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€1.2M – €3.0M Model value (performance-implied)€3.3M – €10.6M Projected value (24 months)€1.3M – €2.7M Dashed line: current market value (€3.5M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Bremer and Marc Oliver Kempf
- Bremer is 2 years younger, which the models associate with more appreciation and resale potential.
- Kempf is estimated to cost far less (€1.5M vs €28.4M mid-estimate).
- On value for money the model prefers Kempf (Bargain Index 65 vs 2) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
- Risk differs: Bremer Low, Kempf Moderate.